On the Complexity of Modal Separation Logics

International audienceWe introduce a modal separation logic MSL whose models are memory states from separation logic and the logical connectives include modal operators as well as separating conjunction and implication from separation logic. With such a combination of operators, some fragments of MSL can be seen as genuine modal logics whereas some others capture standard separation logics, leading to an original language to speak about memory states. We analyse the decidability status and the computational complexity of several fragments of MSL, leading to surprising results, obtained by designing proof methods that take into account the modal and separation features of MSL. For example, the satisfiability problem for the fragment of MSL with 3, the inequality modality = and separating conjunction * is shown Tower-complete whereas the restriction either to 3 and * or to = and * is only NP-complete

Relation-Changing Logics as Fragments of Hybrid Logics

Relation-changing modal logics are extensions of the basic modal logic that allow changes to the accessibility relation of a model during the evaluation of a formula. In particular, they are equipped with dynamic modalities that are able to delete, add, and swap edges in the model, both locally and globally. We provide translations from these logics to hybrid logic along with an implementation. In general, these logics are undecidable, but we use our translations to identify decidable fragments. We also compare the expressive power of relation-changing modal logics with hybrid logics.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2016, arXiv:1609.0364

Axiomatizations for downward XPath on Data Trees

We give sound and complete axiomatizations for XPath with data tests by "equality" or "inequality", and containing the single "child" axis. This data-aware logic predicts over data trees, which are tree-like structures whose every node contains a label from a finite alphabet and a data value from an infinite domain. The language allows us to compare data values of two nodes but cannot access the data values themselves (i.e. there is no comparison by constants). Our axioms are in the style of equational logic, extending the axiomatization of data-oblivious XPath, by B. ten Cate, T. Litak and M. Marx. We axiomatize the full logic with tests by "equality" and "inequality", and also a simpler fragment with "equality" tests only. Our axiomatizations apply both to node expressions and path expressions. The proof of completeness relies on a novel normal form theorem for XPath with data tests

Satisfiability for relation-changing logics

Relation-changing modal logics (RC for short) are extensions of the basic modal logic with dynamic operators that modify the accessibility relation of a model during the evaluation of a formula. These languages are equipped with dynamic modalities that are able e.g. to delete, add and swap edges in the model, both locally and globally. We study the satisfiability problem for some of these logics.We first show that they can be translated into hybrid logic. As a result, we can transfer some results from hybrid logics to RC. We discuss in particular decidability for some fragments. We then show that satisfiability is, in general, undecidable for all the languages introduced, via translations from memory logics.Fil: Areces, Carlos Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física. Sección Ciencias de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Fervari, Raul Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física. Sección Ciencias de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Hoffmann, Guillaume Emmanuel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física. Sección Ciencias de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Martel, Mauricio. Universitat Bremen; Alemani

Relation-changing modal operators

We study dynamic modal operators that can change the accessibility relation of a model during the evaluation of a formula. In particular, we extend the basic modal language with modalities that are able to delete, add or swap an edge between pairs of elements of the domain. We define a generic framework to characterize this kind of operations. First, we investigate relation-changing modal logics as fragments of classical logics. Then, we use the new framework to get a suitable notion of bisimulation for the logics introduced, and we investigate their expressive power. Finally, we show that the complexity of the model checking problem for the particular operators introduced is PSpace-complete, and we study two subproblems of model checking: formula complexity and program complexity.Fil: Areces, Carlos Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Fervari, Raul Alberto. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Hoffmann, Guillaume Emmanuel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin

Axiomatizing hybrid xpath with data

In this paper we introduce sound and strongly complete axiomatizations for XPath with data constraints extended with hybrid operators. First, we present HXPath=, a multi-modal version of XPath with data, extended with nominals and the hybrid operator @. Then, we introduce an axiomatic system for HXPath=, and we prove it is strongly complete with respect to the class of abstract data models, i.e., data models in which data values are abstracted as equivalence relations. We prove a general completeness result similar to the one presented in, e.g., [BtC06], that ensures that certain extensions of the axiomatic system we introduce are also complete. The axiomatic systems that can be obtained in this way cover a large family of hybrid XPath languages over different classes of frames, for which we present concrete examples. In addition, we investigate axiomatizations over the class of tree models, structures widely used in practice. We show that a strongly complete, finitary, first-order axiomatization of hybrid XPath over trees does not exist, and we propose two alternatives to deal with this issue. We finally introduce filtrations to investigate the status of decidability of the satisfiability problem for these languages.Fil: Areces, Carlos Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física. Sección Ciencias de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Fervari, Raul Alberto. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física. Sección Ciencias de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentin

Axiomatising logics with separating conjunctions and modalities

International audienceModal separation logics are formalisms that combine modal operators to reason locally, with separating connectives that allow to perform global updates on the models. In this work, we design Hilbert-style proof systems for the modal separation logics MSL(⇤, h6 =i) and MSL(⇤, 3), where ⇤ is the separating conjunction, 3 is the standard modal operator and h6 =i is the di↵erence modality. The calculi only use the logical languages at hand (no external features such as labels) and take advantage of new normal forms and of their axiomatisation

Towards scaling up DynAlloy analysis using predicate abstraction

DynAlloy is an extension to the Alloy specifi cation language suitable for modeling properties of executions of software systems. DynAlloy provides fully automated support for verifying properties of programs, in the style of the Alloy Analyzer, i.e., by exhaustively searching for counterexamples of properties in bounded scenarios (bounded domains and iterations of programs). But, as for other automated analysis techniques, the so called state explotion problem makes the analysis feasible only for small bounds. In this paper, we take advantage of an abstraction technique known as predicate abstraction, for scaling up the analysis of DynAlloy specifi cations. The implementation of predicate abstraction we present enables us to substantially increase the domain and iteration bounds in some case studies, and its use is fully automated. Our implementation is relatively e cient, exploiting the reuse of already calculated abstractions when these are available, and an "on the fly" check of traces when looking for counterexamples. We introduce the implementation of the technique, and some preliminary experimental results with case studies, to illustrate the benefi ts of the technique.VI Workshop Ingeniería de Software (WIS)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI